Michael Saylor and Adam Back Issue Statements Opposing BIP 110, Emphasizing Bitcoin's Decentralization Spirit

CoinFeed reported on July 12 that Blockstream co-founder Adam Back addressed the Bitcoin community's controversy over BIP 110, stating that he understands and sympathizes with the concerns of those who support BIP 110, as they hate spam transactions and want to protect the network. However, this proposal is essentially an act of 'trying to spy on others,' which would erode Bitcoin's decentralization, security, and neutrality, fundamentally conflicting with the spirit of Bitcoin. In response, Michael Saylor retweeted and remarked, 'There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns the spam debate into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions. This precedent is the real danger, and efforts should be focused on the really important threats.'